AMR vs Latvia: Mean total cholesterol, crude
AMR
4.7
in 2018
Latvia
5.3
in 2018
AMR rank
3rd
Latvia rank
1st
Mean total cholesterol, crude over time
- AMR
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 5.3 against 4.7 in AMR, a difference of 0.6.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times AMR's.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
AMR ranks 3rd and Latvia ranks 1st of 11 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AMR | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5 | 5.85 | 0.85 | Latvia |
| 1990s | 4.91 | 5.67 | 0.76 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 4.84 | 5.5 | 0.66 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 4.74 | 5.34 | 0.6 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean total cholesterol, crude, AMR or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 5.3 against 4.7 in AMR as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean total cholesterol, crude between AMR and Latvia?
- 0.6, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AMR and Latvia?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do AMR and Latvia rank globally for mean total cholesterol, crude?
- AMR ranks 3rd and Latvia ranks 1st of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean total cholesterol, crude. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.