AFR vs Malaysia: Mean total cholesterol, crude
AFR
4
in 2018
Malaysia
5.1
in 2018
AFR rank
11th
Malaysia rank
11th
Mean total cholesterol, crude over time
- AFR
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 5.1 against 4 in AFR, a difference of 1.1.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.3 times AFR's.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
AFR ranks 11th and Malaysia ranks 11th of 11 groups.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AFR | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3.88 | 4.63 | 0.75 | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 3.9 | 4.76 | 0.86 | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 3.9 | 4.97 | 1.07 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 3.96 | 5.1 | 1.14 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean total cholesterol, crude, AFR or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 5.1 against 4 in AFR as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean total cholesterol, crude between AFR and Malaysia?
- 1.1, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AFR and Malaysia?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do AFR and Malaysia rank globally for mean total cholesterol, crude?
- AFR ranks 11th and Malaysia ranks 11th of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean total cholesterol, crude. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.