Malta vs Sur: Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized
Malta
5.1
in 2018
Sur
4.5
in 2018
Malta rank
3rd
Sur rank
1st
Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized over time
- Malta
- Sur
How they compare
Malta currently reports 5.1 against 4.5 in Sur, a difference of 0.6.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Sur's.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 3rd and Sur ranks 1st of 190 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 6 | 4.7 | 1.3 | Malta |
| 1990s | 5.65 | 4.63 | 1.02 | Malta |
| 2000s | 5.35 | 4.6 | 0.75 | Malta |
| 2010s | 5.14 | 4.54 | 0.6 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean total cholesterol, age-standardized, Malta or Sur?
- Malta, at 5.1 against 4.5 in Sur as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean total cholesterol, age-standardized between Malta and Sur?
- 0.6, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sur?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Malta and Sur rank globally for mean total cholesterol, age-standardized?
- Malta ranks 3rd and Sur ranks 1st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.