Malaysia vs Sur: Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized
Malaysia
5.2
in 2018
Sur
4.5
in 2018
Malaysia rank
1st
Sur rank
1st
Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized over time
- Malaysia
- Sur
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 5.2 against 4.5 in Sur, a difference of 0.7.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.2 times Sur's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Sur ahead.
Malaysia ranks 1st and Sur ranks 1st of 190 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4.71 | 4.7 | 0.01 | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 4.83 | 4.63 | 0.2 | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 5.03 | 4.6 | 0.43 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 5.13 | 4.54 | 0.5889 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean total cholesterol, age-standardized, Malaysia or Sur?
- Malaysia, at 5.2 against 4.5 in Sur as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean total cholesterol, age-standardized between Malaysia and Sur?
- 0.7, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Sur?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Malaysia and Sur rank globally for mean total cholesterol, age-standardized?
- Malaysia ranks 1st and Sur ranks 1st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.