Latvia vs Upper-middle income (World Bank): Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized
Latvia
5.1
in 2018
Upper-middle income (World Bank)
4.7
in 2018
Latvia rank
3rd
Upper-middle income (World Bank) rank
3rd
Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized over time
- Latvia
- Upper-middle income (World Bank)
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 5.1 against 4.7 in Upper-middle income (World Bank), a difference of 0.4.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Upper-middle income (World Bank)'s.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 3rd and Upper-middle income (World Bank) ranks 3rd of 190 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Upper-middle income (World Bank) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.76 | 4.54 | 1.22 | Latvia |
| 1990s | 5.57 | 4.6 | 0.97 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 5.38 | 4.63 | 0.75 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 5.2 | 4.7 | 0.5 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean total cholesterol, age-standardized, Latvia or Upper-middle income (World Bank)?
- Latvia, at 5.1 against 4.7 in Upper-middle income (World Bank) as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean total cholesterol, age-standardized between Latvia and Upper-middle income (World Bank)?
- 0.4, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Upper-middle income (World Bank)?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Latvia and Upper-middle income (World Bank) rank globally for mean total cholesterol, age-standardized?
- Latvia ranks 3rd and Upper-middle income (World Bank) ranks 3rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.