High income (World Bank) vs Latvia: Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized
High income (World Bank)
4.8
in 2018
Latvia
5.1
in 2018
High income (World Bank) rank
2nd
Latvia rank
3rd
Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized over time
- High income (World Bank)
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 5.1 against 4.8 in High income (World Bank), a difference of 0.3.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times High income (World Bank)'s.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
High income (World Bank) ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 3rd of 11 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | High income (World Bank) | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.44 | 5.76 | 0.32 | Latvia |
| 1990s | 5.27 | 5.57 | 0.3 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 5.07 | 5.38 | 0.31 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 4.88 | 5.2 | 0.3222 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean total cholesterol, age-standardized, High income (World Bank) or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 5.1 against 4.8 in High income (World Bank) as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean total cholesterol, age-standardized between High income (World Bank) and Latvia?
- 0.3, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for High income (World Bank) and Latvia?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do High income (World Bank) and Latvia rank globally for mean total cholesterol, age-standardized?
- High income (World Bank) ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 3rd of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.