Congo, Rep. vs Equatorial Guinea: Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized

Congo, Rep.
4.1
in 2018
Equatorial Guinea
4.1
in 2018
Congo, Rep. rank
151st
Equatorial Guinea rank
151st

Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized over time

  • Congo, Rep.
  • Equatorial Guinea
01234198019992018

How they compare

Congo, Rep. currently reports 4.1 against 4.1 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Congo, Rep. ahead.

Congo, Rep. ranks 151st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 151st of 190 countries.

Congo, Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Rep. Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1980s 4.2 4 0.2 Congo, Rep.
1990s 4.2 4.02 0.18 Congo, Rep.
2000s 4.19 4.1 0.09 Congo, Rep.
2010s 4.1 4.1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mean total cholesterol, age-standardized, Congo, Rep. or Equatorial Guinea?
Congo, Rep., at 4.1 against 4.1 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2018.
What is the difference in mean total cholesterol, age-standardized between Congo, Rep. and Equatorial Guinea?
0, with Congo, Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Rep. and Equatorial Guinea?
39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
How do Congo, Rep. and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for mean total cholesterol, age-standardized?
Congo, Rep. ranks 151st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 151st of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized
Source
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (WHO)
Coverage
202 places, 7,878 data points, 1980–2018
Last refreshed