Barbados vs Sri Lanka: Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized
Barbados
4.4
in 2018
Sri Lanka
4.4
in 2018
Barbados rank
113th
Sri Lanka rank
113th
Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized over time
- Barbados
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 4.4 against 4.4 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 113th and Sri Lanka ranks 113th of 190 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4.4 | 4.16 | 0.24 | Barbados |
| 1990s | 4.37 | 4.24 | 0.13 | Barbados |
| 2000s | 4.3 | 4.32 | 0.02 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 4.33 | 4.4 | 0.0667 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean total cholesterol, age-standardized, Barbados or Sri Lanka?
- Barbados, at 4.4 against 4.4 in Sri Lanka as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean total cholesterol, age-standardized between Barbados and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Sri Lanka?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Barbados and Sri Lanka rank globally for mean total cholesterol, age-standardized?
- Barbados ranks 113th and Sri Lanka ranks 113th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.