AMR vs Lebanon: Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized
AMR
4.6
in 2018
Lebanon
5
in 2018
AMR rank
7th
Lebanon rank
10th
Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized over time
- AMR
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 5 against 4.6 in AMR, a difference of 0.4.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.1 times AMR's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was AMR ahead.
AMR ranks 7th and Lebanon ranks 10th of 17 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, AMR averaged higher in 1 and Lebanon in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AMR | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.06 | 5.02 | 0.04 | AMR |
| 1990s | 4.95 | 5.1 | 0.15 | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 4.85 | 5 | 0.15 | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 4.72 | 5 | 0.2778 | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean total cholesterol, age-standardized, AMR or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 5 against 4.6 in AMR as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean total cholesterol, age-standardized between AMR and Lebanon?
- 0.4, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AMR and Lebanon?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do AMR and Lebanon rank globally for mean total cholesterol, age-standardized?
- AMR ranks 7th and Lebanon ranks 10th of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.