Mauritius vs Namibia: Mean systolic blood pressure
Mauritius
130.2
in 2009
Namibia
130.4
in 2009
Mauritius rank
30th
Namibia rank
27th
Mean systolic blood pressure over time
- Mauritius
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 130.4 against 130.2 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.2.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 30th and Namibia ranks 27th of 179 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 127.88 | 130.42 | 2.54 | Namibia |
| 1990s | 128.43 | 129.17 | 0.74 | Namibia |
| 2000s | 129.39 | 129.56 | 0.17 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean systolic blood pressure, Mauritius or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 130.4 against 130.2 in Mauritius as of 2009.
- What is the difference in mean systolic blood pressure between Mauritius and Namibia?
- 0.2, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2009.
- How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for mean systolic blood pressure?
- Mauritius ranks 30th and Namibia ranks 27th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean systolic blood pressure (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.