Chile vs Sri Lanka: Mean systolic blood pressure
Chile
125.8
in 2009
Sri Lanka
125.4
in 2009
Chile rank
94th
Sri Lanka rank
95th
Mean systolic blood pressure over time
- Chile
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Chile currently reports 125.8 against 125.4 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.4.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 94th and Sri Lanka ranks 95th of 179 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 127.4 | 120.63 | 6.77 | Chile |
| 1990s | 125.91 | 122.01 | 3.9 | Chile |
| 2000s | 125.79 | 124.47 | 1.32 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean systolic blood pressure, Chile or Sri Lanka?
- Chile, at 125.8 against 125.4 in Sri Lanka as of 2009.
- What is the difference in mean systolic blood pressure between Chile and Sri Lanka?
- 0.4, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sri Lanka?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2009.
- How do Chile and Sri Lanka rank globally for mean systolic blood pressure?
- Chile ranks 94th and Sri Lanka ranks 95th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean systolic blood pressure (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.