Libya vs Nauru: Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, crude
Libya
3.1
in 2018
Nauru
3.1
in 2018
Libya rank
132nd
Nauru rank
132nd
Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, crude over time
- Libya
- Nauru
How they compare
Libya currently reports 3.1 against 3.1 in Nauru, a difference of 0.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 132nd and Nauru ranks 132nd of 190 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3.43 | 3.87 | 0.44 | Nauru |
| 1990s | 3.5 | 3.97 | 0.47 | Nauru |
| 2000s | 3.34 | 3.7 | 0.36 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 3.16 | 3.31 | 0.1556 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean non-hdl cholesterol, crude, Libya or Nauru?
- Libya, at 3.1 against 3.1 in Nauru as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean non-hdl cholesterol, crude between Libya and Nauru?
- 0, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Nauru?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Libya and Nauru rank globally for mean non-hdl cholesterol, crude?
- Libya ranks 132nd and Nauru ranks 132nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, crude. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.