Ecuador vs Mauritius: Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, crude
Ecuador
3.7
in 2018
Mauritius
3.7
in 2018
Ecuador rank
18th
Mauritius rank
18th
Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, crude over time
- Ecuador
- Mauritius
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 3.7 against 3.7 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Mauritius ahead.
Ecuador ranks 18th and Mauritius ranks 18th of 190 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3.61 | 3.79 | 0.18 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 3.77 | 3.7 | 0.07 | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 3.8 | 3.7 | 0.1 | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 3.79 | 3.7 | 0.0889 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean non-hdl cholesterol, crude, Ecuador or Mauritius?
- Ecuador, at 3.7 against 3.7 in Mauritius as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean non-hdl cholesterol, crude between Ecuador and Mauritius?
- 0, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mauritius?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Ecuador and Mauritius rank globally for mean non-hdl cholesterol, crude?
- Ecuador ranks 18th and Mauritius ranks 18th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, crude. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.