Belarus vs Sri Lanka: Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, crude
Belarus
3.4
in 2018
Sri Lanka
3.4
in 2018
Belarus rank
74th
Sri Lanka rank
74th
Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, crude over time
- Belarus
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 3.4 against 3.4 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 74th and Sri Lanka ranks 74th of 190 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4.1 | 2.75 | 1.35 | Belarus |
| 1990s | 4.01 | 2.93 | 1.08 | Belarus |
| 2000s | 3.77 | 3.11 | 0.66 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 3.5 | 3.31 | 0.1889 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean non-hdl cholesterol, crude, Belarus or Sri Lanka?
- Belarus, at 3.4 against 3.4 in Sri Lanka as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean non-hdl cholesterol, crude between Belarus and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sri Lanka?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Belarus and Sri Lanka rank globally for mean non-hdl cholesterol, crude?
- Belarus ranks 74th and Sri Lanka ranks 74th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, crude. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.