Sur vs Thailand: Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, age-standardized
Sur
3.3
in 2018
Thailand
4
in 2018
Sur rank
1st
Thailand rank
2nd
Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, age-standardized over time
- Sur
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 4 against 3.3 in Sur, a difference of 0.7.
That makes Thailand's figure about 1.2 times Sur's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Sur ahead.
Sur ranks 1st and Thailand ranks 2nd of 1 regions.
Across the 4 decades both report, Sur averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sur | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3.5 | 3.44 | 0.06 | Sur |
| 1990s | 3.45 | 3.7 | 0.25 | Thailand |
| 2000s | 3.4 | 3.88 | 0.48 | Thailand |
| 2010s | 3.34 | 4 | 0.6556 | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean non-hdl cholesterol, age-standardized, Sur or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 4 against 3.3 in Sur as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean non-hdl cholesterol, age-standardized between Sur and Thailand?
- 0.7, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sur and Thailand?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Sur and Thailand rank globally for mean non-hdl cholesterol, age-standardized?
- Sur ranks 1st and Thailand ranks 2nd of 1 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, age-standardized. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.