Nauru vs Sudan: Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, age-standardized
Nauru
3.1
in 2018
Sudan
3.1
in 2018
Nauru rank
133rd
Sudan rank
133rd
Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, age-standardized over time
- Nauru
- Sudan
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 3.1 against 3.1 in Sudan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Nauru ahead.
Nauru ranks 133rd and Sudan ranks 133rd of 190 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4.02 | 2.61 | 1.41 | Nauru |
| 1990s | 4.07 | 2.72 | 1.35 | Nauru |
| 2000s | 3.76 | 2.82 | 0.94 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 3.32 | 2.98 | 0.3444 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean non-hdl cholesterol, age-standardized, Nauru or Sudan?
- Nauru, at 3.1 against 3.1 in Sudan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean non-hdl cholesterol, age-standardized between Nauru and Sudan?
- 0, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Sudan?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Nauru and Sudan rank globally for mean non-hdl cholesterol, age-standardized?
- Nauru ranks 133rd and Sudan ranks 133rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, age-standardized. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.