Nauru vs Solomon Islands: Mean HDL cholesterol, crude
Nauru
1
in 2018
Solomon Islands
1
in 2018
Nauru rank
155th
Solomon Islands rank
155th
Mean HDL cholesterol, crude over time
- Nauru
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 1 against 1 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Nauru ranks 155th and Solomon Islands ranks 155th of 190 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.94 | 1.2 | 0.26 | Solomon Islands |
| 1990s | 1.05 | 1.2 | 0.15 | Solomon Islands |
| 2000s | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1.02 | 1.01 | 0.0111 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hdl cholesterol, crude, Nauru or Solomon Islands?
- Nauru, at 1 against 1 in Solomon Islands as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean hdl cholesterol, crude between Nauru and Solomon Islands?
- 0, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Solomon Islands?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Nauru and Solomon Islands rank globally for mean hdl cholesterol, crude?
- Nauru ranks 155th and Solomon Islands ranks 155th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean HDL cholesterol, crude. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.