Mauritius vs Namibia: Mean HDL cholesterol, crude
Mauritius
1.2
in 2018
Namibia
1.2
in 2018
Mauritius rank
62nd
Namibia rank
62nd
Mean HDL cholesterol, crude over time
- Mauritius
- Namibia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 1.2 against 1.2 in Namibia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 62nd and Namibia ranks 62nd of 190 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.1 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.1 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.1 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 1.23 | 1.2 | 0.0333 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hdl cholesterol, crude, Mauritius or Namibia?
- Mauritius, at 1.2 against 1.2 in Namibia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean hdl cholesterol, crude between Mauritius and Namibia?
- 0, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for mean hdl cholesterol, crude?
- Mauritius ranks 62nd and Namibia ranks 62nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean HDL cholesterol, crude. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.