Latvia vs Sur: Mean HDL cholesterol, crude
Latvia
1.5
in 2018
Sur
1.1
in 2018
Latvia rank
3rd
Sur rank
1st
Mean HDL cholesterol, crude over time
- Latvia
- Sur
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1.5 against 1.1 in Sur, a difference of 0.4.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.4 times Sur's.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 3rd and Sur ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.3 | Latvia |
| 1990s | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.3 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 1.49 | 1.17 | 0.32 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1.5 | 1.13 | 0.3667 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hdl cholesterol, crude, Latvia or Sur?
- Latvia, at 1.5 against 1.1 in Sur as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean hdl cholesterol, crude between Latvia and Sur?
- 0.4, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sur?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Latvia and Sur rank globally for mean hdl cholesterol, crude?
- Latvia ranks 3rd and Sur ranks 1st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean HDL cholesterol, crude. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.