Ecuador vs Namibia: Mean HDL cholesterol, crude
Ecuador
1.2
in 2018
Namibia
1.2
in 2018
Ecuador rank
62nd
Namibia rank
62nd
Mean HDL cholesterol, crude over time
- Ecuador
- Namibia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 1.2 against 1.2 in Namibia, a difference of 0.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 62nd and Namibia ranks 62nd of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hdl cholesterol, crude, Ecuador or Namibia?
- Ecuador, at 1.2 against 1.2 in Namibia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean hdl cholesterol, crude between Ecuador and Namibia?
- 0, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for mean hdl cholesterol, crude?
- Ecuador ranks 62nd and Namibia ranks 62nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean HDL cholesterol, crude. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.