AMR vs Iceland: Mean HDL cholesterol, crude
AMR
1.2
in 2018
Iceland
1.5
in 2018
AMR rank
6th
Iceland rank
3rd
Mean HDL cholesterol, crude over time
- AMR
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 1.5 against 1.2 in AMR, a difference of 0.3.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times AMR's.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
AMR ranks 6th and Iceland ranks 3rd of 17 groups.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AMR | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.2 | Iceland |
| 1990s | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.2 | Iceland |
| 2000s | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.2 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 1.2 | 1.43 | 0.2333 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hdl cholesterol, crude, AMR or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 1.5 against 1.2 in AMR as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean hdl cholesterol, crude between AMR and Iceland?
- 0.3, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AMR and Iceland?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do AMR and Iceland rank globally for mean hdl cholesterol, crude?
- AMR ranks 6th and Iceland ranks 3rd of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean HDL cholesterol, crude. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.