Latvia vs Mus: Mean HDL cholesterol, age-standardized
Latvia
1.5
in 2018
Mus
1.2
in 2018
Latvia rank
3rd
Mus rank
1st
Mean HDL cholesterol, age-standardized over time
- Latvia
- Mus
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1.5 against 1.2 in Mus, a difference of 0.3.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Mus's.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 3rd and Mus ranks 1st of 190 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.1 | Latvia |
| 1990s | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.1 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 1.48 | 1.3 | 0.18 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1.5 | 1.23 | 0.2667 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hdl cholesterol, age-standardized, Latvia or Mus?
- Latvia, at 1.5 against 1.2 in Mus as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean hdl cholesterol, age-standardized between Latvia and Mus?
- 0.3, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mus?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Latvia and Mus rank globally for mean hdl cholesterol, age-standardized?
- Latvia ranks 3rd and Mus ranks 1st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean HDL cholesterol, age-standardized. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.