Iceland vs Sur: Mean HDL cholesterol, age-standardized
Iceland
1.5
in 2018
Sur
1.1
in 2018
Iceland rank
3rd
Sur rank
1st
Mean HDL cholesterol, age-standardized over time
- Iceland
- Sur
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 1.5 against 1.1 in Sur, a difference of 0.4.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.4 times Sur's.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 3rd and Sur ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.3 | Iceland |
| 1990s | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.3 | Iceland |
| 2000s | 1.4 | 1.19 | 0.21 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 1.42 | 1.16 | 0.2667 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hdl cholesterol, age-standardized, Iceland or Sur?
- Iceland, at 1.5 against 1.1 in Sur as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean hdl cholesterol, age-standardized between Iceland and Sur?
- 0.4, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sur?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Iceland and Sur rank globally for mean hdl cholesterol, age-standardized?
- Iceland ranks 3rd and Sur ranks 1st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean HDL cholesterol, age-standardized. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.