Australia vs Sur: Mean HDL cholesterol, age-standardized
Australia
1.5
in 2018
Sur
1.1
in 2018
Australia rank
3rd
Sur rank
1st
Mean HDL cholesterol, age-standardized over time
- Australia
- Sur
How they compare
Australia currently reports 1.5 against 1.1 in Sur, a difference of 0.4.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.4 times Sur's.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 3rd and Sur ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.32 | 1.1 | 0.22 | Australia |
| 1990s | 1.31 | 1.1 | 0.21 | Australia |
| 2000s | 1.4 | 1.19 | 0.21 | Australia |
| 2010s | 1.41 | 1.16 | 0.2556 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hdl cholesterol, age-standardized, Australia or Sur?
- Australia, at 1.5 against 1.1 in Sur as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean hdl cholesterol, age-standardized between Australia and Sur?
- 0.4, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Sur?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Australia and Sur rank globally for mean hdl cholesterol, age-standardized?
- Australia ranks 3rd and Sur ranks 1st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean HDL cholesterol, age-standardized. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.