Sur vs Tonga: Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)
Sur
5.8
in 2009
Tonga
6.4
in 2009
Sur rank
1st
Tonga rank
2nd
Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) over time
- Sur
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 6.4 against 5.8 in Sur, a difference of 0.6.
That makes Tonga's figure about 1.1 times Sur's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.
Sur ranks 1st and Tonga ranks 2nd of 2 regions.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sur | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.26 | 5.35 | 0.09 | Tonga |
| 1990s | 5.34 | 5.56 | 0.22 | Tonga |
| 2000s | 5.66 | 6.12 | 0.46 | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l), Sur or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 6.4 against 5.8 in Sur as of 2009.
- What is the difference in mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) between Sur and Tonga?
- 0.6, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sur and Tonga?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2009.
- How do Sur and Tonga rank globally for mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)?
- Sur ranks 1st and Tonga ranks 2nd of 2 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.