Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwe: Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)
Sri Lanka
5.3
in 2009
Zimbabwe
5.3
in 2009
Sri Lanka rank
95th
Zimbabwe rank
95th
Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) over time
- Sri Lanka
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 5.3 against 5.3 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 95th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.25 | 5.3 | 0.05 | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 5.3 | 5.3 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 5.34 | 5.3 | 0.04 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l), Sri Lanka or Zimbabwe?
- Sri Lanka, at 5.3 against 5.3 in Zimbabwe as of 2009.
- What is the difference in mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) between Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2009.
- How do Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe rank globally for mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)?
- Sri Lanka ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 95th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.