Saudi Arabia vs Sur: Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)
Saudi Arabia
6.4
in 2009
Sur
5.8
in 2009
Saudi Arabia rank
2nd
Sur rank
1st
Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Sur
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 6.4 against 5.8 in Sur, a difference of 0.6.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Sur's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Sur ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 2nd and Sur ranks 1st of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 2 and Sur in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.22 | 5.26 | 0.04 | Sur |
| 1990s | 5.67 | 5.34 | 0.33 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 6.2 | 5.66 | 0.54 | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l), Saudi Arabia or Sur?
- Saudi Arabia, at 6.4 against 5.8 in Sur as of 2009.
- What is the difference in mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) between Saudi Arabia and Sur?
- 0.6, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Sur?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2009.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Sur rank globally for mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 2nd and Sur ranks 1st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.