New Zealand vs Norway: Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)
New Zealand
5.5
in 2009
Norway
5.5
in 2009
New Zealand rank
47th
Norway rank
47th
Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) over time
- New Zealand
- Norway
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 5.5 against 5.5 in Norway, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Norway ahead.
New Zealand ranks 47th and Norway ranks 47th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.13 | 5.26 | 0.13 | Norway |
| 1990s | 5.29 | 5.4 | 0.11 | Norway |
| 2000s | 5.47 | 5.45 | 0.02 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l), New Zealand or Norway?
- New Zealand, at 5.5 against 5.5 in Norway as of 2009.
- What is the difference in mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) between New Zealand and Norway?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Norway?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2009.
- How do New Zealand and Norway rank globally for mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)?
- New Zealand ranks 47th and Norway ranks 47th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.