Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)
Namibia
5.3
in 2009
Zimbabwe
5.3
in 2009
Namibia rank
95th
Zimbabwe rank
95th
Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) over time
- Namibia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 5.3 against 5.3 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 95th of 179 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5 | 5.3 | 0.3 | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 5.09 | 5.3 | 0.21 | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 5.25 | 5.3 | 0.05 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l), Namibia or Zimbabwe?
- Namibia, at 5.3 against 5.3 in Zimbabwe as of 2009.
- What is the difference in mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) between Namibia and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zimbabwe?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2009.
- How do Namibia and Zimbabwe rank globally for mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)?
- Namibia ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 95th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.