Namibia vs Sri Lanka: Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)
Namibia
5.3
in 2009
Sri Lanka
5.3
in 2009
Namibia rank
95th
Sri Lanka rank
95th
Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) over time
- Namibia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 5.3 against 5.3 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 95th of 179 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5 | 5.25 | 0.25 | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 5.09 | 5.3 | 0.21 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 5.25 | 5.34 | 0.09 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l), Namibia or Sri Lanka?
- Namibia, at 5.3 against 5.3 in Sri Lanka as of 2009.
- What is the difference in mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) between Namibia and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sri Lanka?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2009.
- How do Namibia and Sri Lanka rank globally for mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)?
- Namibia ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 95th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.