Mus vs Tonga: Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) (crude estimate)
Mus
5.5
in 2009
Tonga
6.4
in 2009
Mus rank
2nd
Tonga rank
2nd
Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) (crude estimate) over time
- Mus
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 6.4 against 5.5 in Mus, a difference of 0.9.
That makes Tonga's figure about 1.2 times Mus's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.
Mus ranks 2nd and Tonga ranks 2nd of 2 regions.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mus | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.25 | 5.35 | 0.1 | Tonga |
| 1990s | 5.42 | 5.56 | 0.14 | Tonga |
| 2000s | 5.5 | 6.12 | 0.62 | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l), Mus or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 6.4 against 5.5 in Mus as of 2009.
- What is the difference in mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) between Mus and Tonga?
- 0.9, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mus and Tonga?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2009.
- How do Mus and Tonga rank globally for mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)?
- Mus ranks 2nd and Tonga ranks 2nd of 2 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.