Mauritius vs New Zealand: Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)
Mauritius
5.5
in 2009
New Zealand
5.5
in 2009
Mauritius rank
47th
New Zealand rank
47th
Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) over time
- Mauritius
- New Zealand
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 5.5 against 5.5 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 47th and New Zealand ranks 47th of 179 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.25 | 5.13 | 0.12 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 5.42 | 5.29 | 0.13 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 5.5 | 5.47 | 0.03 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l), Mauritius or New Zealand?
- Mauritius, at 5.5 against 5.5 in New Zealand as of 2009.
- What is the difference in mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) between Mauritius and New Zealand?
- 0, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Zealand?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2009.
- How do Mauritius and New Zealand rank globally for mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)?
- Mauritius ranks 47th and New Zealand ranks 47th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.