Malta vs South Africa: Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)
Malta
5.6
in 2009
South Africa
5.6
in 2009
Malta rank
30th
South Africa rank
30th
Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) over time
- Malta
- South Africa
How they compare
Malta currently reports 5.6 against 5.6 in South Africa, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1980 it was South Africa ahead.
Malta ranks 30th and South Africa ranks 30th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.37 | 5.3 | 0.07 | Malta |
| 1990s | 5.47 | 5.41 | 0.06 | Malta |
| 2000s | 5.55 | 5.56 | 0.01 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l), Malta or South Africa?
- Malta, at 5.6 against 5.6 in South Africa as of 2009.
- What is the difference in mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) between Malta and South Africa?
- 0, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and South Africa?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2009.
- How do Malta and South Africa rank globally for mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)?
- Malta ranks 30th and South Africa ranks 30th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.