Malaysia vs Malta: Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)
Malaysia
5.6
in 2009
Malta
5.6
in 2009
Malaysia rank
30th
Malta rank
30th
Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) over time
- Malaysia
- Malta
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 5.6 against 5.6 in Malta, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Malta ahead.
Malaysia ranks 30th and Malta ranks 30th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.24 | 5.37 | 0.13 | Malta |
| 1990s | 5.39 | 5.47 | 0.08 | Malta |
| 2000s | 5.56 | 5.55 | 0.01 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l), Malaysia or Malta?
- Malaysia, at 5.6 against 5.6 in Malta as of 2009.
- What is the difference in mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) between Malaysia and Malta?
- 0, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Malta?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2009.
- How do Malaysia and Malta rank globally for mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)?
- Malaysia ranks 30th and Malta ranks 30th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.