Iceland vs Namibia: Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)
Iceland
5.3
in 2009
Namibia
5.3
in 2009
Iceland rank
95th
Namibia rank
95th
Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) over time
- Iceland
- Namibia
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 5.3 against 5.3 in Namibia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 95th and Namibia ranks 95th of 179 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.18 | 5 | 0.18 | Iceland |
| 1990s | 5.2 | 5.09 | 0.11 | Iceland |
| 2000s | 5.29 | 5.25 | 0.04 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l), Iceland or Namibia?
- Iceland, at 5.3 against 5.3 in Namibia as of 2009.
- What is the difference in mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) between Iceland and Namibia?
- 0, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2009.
- How do Iceland and Namibia rank globally for mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)?
- Iceland ranks 95th and Namibia ranks 95th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.