Costa Rica vs New Zealand: Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)
Costa Rica
5.5
in 2009
New Zealand
5.5
in 2009
Costa Rica rank
47th
New Zealand rank
47th
Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) over time
- Costa Rica
- New Zealand
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 5.5 against 5.5 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 30 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 47th and New Zealand ranks 47th of 179 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4.94 | 5.13 | 0.19 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 5.12 | 5.29 | 0.17 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 5.38 | 5.47 | 0.09 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l), Costa Rica or New Zealand?
- Costa Rica, at 5.5 against 5.5 in New Zealand as of 2009.
- What is the difference in mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) between Costa Rica and New Zealand?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and New Zealand?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2009.
- How do Costa Rica and New Zealand rank globally for mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)?
- Costa Rica ranks 47th and New Zealand ranks 47th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.