Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Zealand: Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
5.5
in 2009
New Zealand
5.5
in 2009
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
47th
New Zealand rank
47th
Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- New Zealand
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 5.5 against 5.5 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 47th and New Zealand ranks 47th of 179 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.26 | 5.13 | 0.13 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1990s | 5.49 | 5.29 | 0.2 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 5.59 | 5.47 | 0.12 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l), Bosnia and Herzegovina or New Zealand?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 5.5 against 5.5 in New Zealand as of 2009.
- What is the difference in mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealand?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealand?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2009.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealand rank globally for mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 47th and New Zealand ranks 47th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.