Australia vs Chile: Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)
Australia
5.4
in 2009
Chile
5.4
in 2009
Australia rank
71st
Chile rank
71st
Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) over time
- Australia
- Chile
How they compare
Australia currently reports 5.4 against 5.4 in Chile, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Chile ahead.
Australia ranks 71st and Chile ranks 71st of 179 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.15 | 5.11 | 0.04 | Australia |
| 1990s | 5.25 | 5.22 | 0.03 | Australia |
| 2000s | 5.39 | 5.35 | 0.04 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l), Australia or Chile?
- Australia, at 5.4 against 5.4 in Chile as of 2009.
- What is the difference in mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) between Australia and Chile?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Chile?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2009.
- How do Australia and Chile rank globally for mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)?
- Australia ranks 71st and Chile ranks 71st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.