Chile vs New Zealand: Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)
Chile
5.29
in 2014
New Zealand
5.31
in 2014
Chile rank
102nd
New Zealand rank
99th
Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) over time
- Chile
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 5.31 against 5.29 in Chile, a difference of 0.02.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 102nd and New Zealand ranks 99th of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5 | 4.98 | 0.0172 | Chile |
| 1990s | 4.95 | 5.09 | 0.1417 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 5.15 | 5.22 | 0.0653 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 5.26 | 5.29 | 0.0322 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l), Chile or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 5.31 against 5.29 in Chile as of 2014.
- What is the difference in mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) between Chile and New Zealand?
- 0.02, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Zealand?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2014.
- How do Chile and New Zealand rank globally for mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)?
- Chile ranks 102nd and New Zealand ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) (age-standardized estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.