SDN736 vs Tuvalu: Mean BMI (kg/m²)
SDN736
24.7
in 2016
Tuvalu
30.8
in 2016
SDN736 rank
6th
Tuvalu rank
6th
Mean BMI (kg/m²) over time
- SDN736
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 30.8 against 24.7 in SDN736, a difference of 6.1.
That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.2 times SDN736's.
Across all 42 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.
SDN736 ranks 6th and Tuvalu ranks 6th of 12 groups.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | SDN736 | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 20.66 | 26.3 | 5.64 | Tuvalu |
| 1980s | 21.35 | 27.77 | 6.42 | Tuvalu |
| 1990s | 22.81 | 29.29 | 6.48 | Tuvalu |
| 2000s | 23.72 | 30.05 | 6.33 | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 24.21 | 30.57 | 6.36 | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean bmi (kg/m²), SDN736 or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 30.8 against 24.7 in SDN736 as of 2016.
- What is the difference in mean bmi (kg/m²) between SDN736 and Tuvalu?
- 6.1, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for SDN736 and Tuvalu?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2016.
- How do SDN736 and Tuvalu rank globally for mean bmi (kg/m²)?
- SDN736 ranks 6th and Tuvalu ranks 6th of 12 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean BMI (kg/m²) (age-standardized estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.