Niue vs Sur: Mean BMI (kg/m²)
Niue
32.4
in 2016
Sur
26.5
in 2016
Niue rank
3rd
Sur rank
1st
Mean BMI (kg/m²) over time
- Niue
- Sur
How they compare
Niue currently reports 32.4 against 26.5 in Sur, a difference of 5.9.
That makes Niue's figure about 1.2 times Sur's.
Across all 42 years both countries report, Niue has been ahead every year.
Niue ranks 3rd and Sur ranks 1st of 189 countries.
Niue has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niue | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 27.8 | 23.26 | 4.54 | Niue |
| 1980s | 29.26 | 24.22 | 5.04 | Niue |
| 1990s | 30.66 | 24.98 | 5.68 | Niue |
| 2000s | 31.5 | 25.75 | 5.75 | Niue |
| 2010s | 32.16 | 26.33 | 5.83 | Niue |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean bmi (kg/m²), Niue or Sur?
- Niue, at 32.4 against 26.5 in Sur as of 2016.
- What is the difference in mean bmi (kg/m²) between Niue and Sur?
- 5.9, with Niue ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niue and Sur?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2016.
- How do Niue and Sur rank globally for mean bmi (kg/m²)?
- Niue ranks 3rd and Sur ranks 1st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean BMI (kg/m²) (age-standardized estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.