Naoero vs Sur: Mean BMI (kg/m²)
Naoero
32.5
in 2016
Sur
26.5
in 2016
Naoero rank
2nd
Sur rank
1st
Mean BMI (kg/m²) over time
- Naoero
- Sur
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 32.5 against 26.5 in Sur, a difference of 6.
That makes Naoero's figure about 1.2 times Sur's.
Across all 42 years both countries report, Naoero has been ahead every year.
Naoero ranks 2nd and Sur ranks 1st of 189 countries.
Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Naoero | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 32.5 | 23.26 | 9.24 | Naoero |
| 1980s | 33.22 | 24.22 | 9 | Naoero |
| 1990s | 33.63 | 24.98 | 8.65 | Naoero |
| 2000s | 33.2 | 25.75 | 7.45 | Naoero |
| 2010s | 32.66 | 26.33 | 6.33 | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean bmi (kg/m²), Naoero or Sur?
- Naoero, at 32.5 against 26.5 in Sur as of 2016.
- What is the difference in mean bmi (kg/m²) between Naoero and Sur?
- 6, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and Sur?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2016.
- How do Naoero and Sur rank globally for mean bmi (kg/m²)?
- Naoero ranks 2nd and Sur ranks 1st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean BMI (kg/m²) (age-standardized estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.