Mus vs Niue: Mean BMI (kg/m²)
Mus
25.2
in 2016
Niue
32.4
in 2016
Mus rank
2nd
Niue rank
3rd
Mean BMI (kg/m²) over time
- Mus
- Niue
How they compare
Niue currently reports 32.4 against 25.2 in Mus, a difference of 7.2.
That makes Niue's figure about 1.3 times Mus's.
Across all 42 years both countries report, Niue has been ahead every year.
Mus ranks 2nd and Niue ranks 3rd of 2 regions.
Niue has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mus | Niue | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 22.4 | 27.8 | 5.4 | Niue |
| 1980s | 23.15 | 29.26 | 6.11 | Niue |
| 1990s | 24.09 | 30.66 | 6.57 | Niue |
| 2000s | 24.73 | 31.5 | 6.77 | Niue |
| 2010s | 25.11 | 32.16 | 7.04 | Niue |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean bmi (kg/m²), Mus or Niue?
- Niue, at 32.4 against 25.2 in Mus as of 2016.
- What is the difference in mean bmi (kg/m²) between Mus and Niue?
- 7.2, with Niue ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mus and Niue?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2016.
- How do Mus and Niue rank globally for mean bmi (kg/m²)?
- Mus ranks 2nd and Niue ranks 3rd of 2 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean BMI (kg/m²) (age-standardized estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.