Mus vs Nauru: Mean BMI (kg/m²)
Mus
25.2
in 2016
Nauru
32.5
in 2016
Mus rank
2nd
Nauru rank
2nd
Mean BMI (kg/m²) over time
- Mus
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 32.5 against 25.2 in Mus, a difference of 7.3.
That makes Nauru's figure about 1.3 times Mus's.
Across all 42 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Mus ranks 2nd and Nauru ranks 2nd of 2 regions.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mus | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 22.4 | 32.5 | 10.1 | Nauru |
| 1980s | 23.15 | 33.22 | 10.07 | Nauru |
| 1990s | 24.09 | 33.63 | 9.54 | Nauru |
| 2000s | 24.73 | 33.2 | 8.47 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 25.11 | 32.66 | 7.54 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean bmi (kg/m²), Mus or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 32.5 against 25.2 in Mus as of 2016.
- What is the difference in mean bmi (kg/m²) between Mus and Nauru?
- 7.3, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mus and Nauru?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2016.
- How do Mus and Nauru rank globally for mean bmi (kg/m²)?
- Mus ranks 2nd and Nauru ranks 2nd of 2 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean BMI (kg/m²) (age-standardized estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.