Mali vs Sri Lanka: Mean BMI (kg/m²)
Mali
23
in 2016
Sri Lanka
23.1
in 2016
Mali rank
163rd
Sri Lanka rank
161st
Mean BMI (kg/m²) over time
- Mali
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 23.1 against 23 in Mali, a difference of 0.1.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Mali ranks 163rd and Sri Lanka ranks 161st of 189 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 18.9 | 19.62 | 0.72 | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 19.76 | 20.22 | 0.46 | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 20.87 | 21.05 | 0.18 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 22.03 | 21.95 | 0.08 | Mali |
| 2010s | 22.79 | 22.8 | 0.0143 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean bmi (kg/m²), Mali or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 23.1 against 23 in Mali as of 2016.
- What is the difference in mean bmi (kg/m²) between Mali and Sri Lanka?
- 0.1, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Sri Lanka?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2016.
- How do Mali and Sri Lanka rank globally for mean bmi (kg/m²)?
- Mali ranks 163rd and Sri Lanka ranks 161st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean BMI (kg/m²) (age-standardized estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.