Low income (World Bank) vs Saint Lucia: Mean BMI (kg/m²)
Low income (World Bank)
22.4
in 2016
Saint Lucia
30
in 2016
Low income (World Bank) rank
11th
Saint Lucia rank
8th
Mean BMI (kg/m²) over time
- Low income (World Bank)
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 30 against 22.4 in Low income (World Bank), a difference of 7.6.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.3 times Low income (World Bank)'s.
Across all 42 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
Low income (World Bank) ranks 11th and Saint Lucia ranks 8th of 12 groups.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income (World Bank) | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 19.2 | 23.2 | 4 | Saint Lucia |
| 1980s | 19.95 | 24.3 | 4.35 | Saint Lucia |
| 1990s | 20.9 | 25.87 | 4.97 | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 21.67 | 27.72 | 6.05 | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 22.24 | 29.36 | 7.11 | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean bmi (kg/m²), Low income (World Bank) or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 30 against 22.4 in Low income (World Bank) as of 2016.
- What is the difference in mean bmi (kg/m²) between Low income (World Bank) and Saint Lucia?
- 7.6, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income (World Bank) and Saint Lucia?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2016.
- How do Low income (World Bank) and Saint Lucia rank globally for mean bmi (kg/m²)?
- Low income (World Bank) ranks 11th and Saint Lucia ranks 8th of 12 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean BMI (kg/m²) (age-standardized estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.