Kiribati vs Niue: Mean BMI (kg/m²)
Kiribati
30.1
in 2016
Niue
32.4
in 2016
Kiribati rank
7th
Niue rank
3rd
Mean BMI (kg/m²) over time
- Kiribati
- Niue
How they compare
Niue currently reports 32.4 against 30.1 in Kiribati, a difference of 2.3.
That makes Niue's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.
Across all 42 years both countries report, Niue has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 7th and Niue ranks 3rd of 189 countries.
Niue has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Niue | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 24.6 | 27.8 | 3.2 | Niue |
| 1980s | 26.26 | 29.26 | 3 | Niue |
| 1990s | 27.96 | 30.66 | 2.7 | Niue |
| 2000s | 29.12 | 31.5 | 2.38 | Niue |
| 2010s | 29.83 | 32.16 | 2.33 | Niue |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean bmi (kg/m²), Kiribati or Niue?
- Niue, at 32.4 against 30.1 in Kiribati as of 2016.
- What is the difference in mean bmi (kg/m²) between Kiribati and Niue?
- 2.3, with Niue ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Niue?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2016.
- How do Kiribati and Niue rank globally for mean bmi (kg/m²)?
- Kiribati ranks 7th and Niue ranks 3rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean BMI (kg/m²) (age-standardized estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.