Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Mean BMI (kg/m²)
Equatorial Guinea
24
in 2016
Namibia
24.2
in 2016
Equatorial Guinea rank
138th
Namibia rank
135th
Mean BMI (kg/m²) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 24.2 against 24 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.2.
Across all 42 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 138th and Namibia ranks 135th of 189 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 20.2 | 20.9 | 0.7 | Namibia |
| 1980s | 20.88 | 21.62 | 0.74 | Namibia |
| 1990s | 22.03 | 22.44 | 0.41 | Namibia |
| 2000s | 23.04 | 23.32 | 0.28 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 23.77 | 24.01 | 0.2429 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean bmi (kg/m²), Equatorial Guinea or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 24.2 against 24 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2016.
- What is the difference in mean bmi (kg/m²) between Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
- 0.2, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2016.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Namibia rank globally for mean bmi (kg/m²)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 138th and Namibia ranks 135th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean BMI (kg/m²) (age-standardized estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.