Cook Islands vs Nauru: Mean BMI (kg/m²)
Cook Islands
32.9
in 2016
Nauru
32.5
in 2016
Cook Islands rank
1st
Nauru rank
2nd
Mean BMI (kg/m²) over time
- Cook Islands
- Nauru
How they compare
Cook Islands currently reports 32.9 against 32.5 in Nauru, a difference of 0.4.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 42 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Nauru ahead.
Cook Islands ranks 1st and Nauru ranks 2nd of 189 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Cook Islands averaged higher in 1 and Nauru in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 28.68 | 32.5 | 3.82 | Nauru |
| 1980s | 29.8 | 33.22 | 3.42 | Nauru |
| 1990s | 31.09 | 33.63 | 2.54 | Nauru |
| 2000s | 32.02 | 33.2 | 1.18 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 32.71 | 32.66 | 0.0571 | Cook Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean bmi (kg/m²), Cook Islands or Nauru?
- Cook Islands, at 32.9 against 32.5 in Nauru as of 2016.
- What is the difference in mean bmi (kg/m²) between Cook Islands and Nauru?
- 0.4, with Cook Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Nauru?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2016.
- How do Cook Islands and Nauru rank globally for mean bmi (kg/m²)?
- Cook Islands ranks 1st and Nauru ranks 2nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean BMI (kg/m²) (age-standardized estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.