Chile vs New Zealand: Mean BMI (kg/m²)
Chile
28
in 2016
New Zealand
28
in 2016
Chile rank
24th
New Zealand rank
24th
Mean BMI (kg/m²) over time
- Chile
- New Zealand
How they compare
Chile currently reports 28 against 28 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 42 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 24th and New Zealand ranks 24th of 189 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 24.98 | 24.2 | 0.78 | Chile |
| 1980s | 25.56 | 24.86 | 0.7 | Chile |
| 1990s | 26.24 | 25.98 | 0.26 | Chile |
| 2000s | 26.98 | 27.15 | 0.17 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 27.7 | 27.83 | 0.1286 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean bmi (kg/m²), Chile or New Zealand?
- Chile, at 28 against 28 in New Zealand as of 2016.
- What is the difference in mean bmi (kg/m²) between Chile and New Zealand?
- 0, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Zealand?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2016.
- How do Chile and New Zealand rank globally for mean bmi (kg/m²)?
- Chile ranks 24th and New Zealand ranks 24th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean BMI (kg/m²) (age-standardized estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.